Andrew Shilling at MarketWatch asked whether it was time to lock in a 4%-plus CD after the Fed held rates at 3.5% to 3.75% for an eighth straight month. Part of his question was why some banks were still paying more than the Fed's posture would suggest.
I called that behind-the-scenes scramble competitive balance sheet management. When lending demand stays high and wholesale funding is expensive, retail deposits become the cheaper source of capital, so banks pay up for them. That pressure does not go away just because the Fed is standing still, which is why a good CD rate can exist even when the policy rate has not moved.
On whether to lock in, I gave readers alternatives to weigh before committing. Short-duration investment-grade bond funds can offer yields in the same neighborhood as CDs with better flexibility. And Treasury bills and notes remain the most straightforward way to stay in the rate without bank-specific risk, with the added benefit of being exempt from state income tax, which matters in a high-tax state.
The decision is not CD versus nothing. It is CD versus a Treasury ladder versus a short bond fund, and the right answer depends on how soon you need the money and what bracket you are in.
Read the full article at MarketWatch →
