Jenna Romaine at U.S. News asked whether the new Trump accounts, $1,000 seeded investment accounts for children born from 2025 through 2028 with up to $5,000 a year in contributions, could become a path to replacing Social Security. The question surfaces every time a personal-account idea appears, and the trust fund's projected 2032 shortfall gives it fresh oxygen.
Do I think Social Security disappears? No. It is a political third rail that has been declared dead four times in my career and survived every one of them. A full elimination is not a real near-term risk, and a savings account for newborns is not a replacement for a program that pays 70 million people today.
What I do think is likely is a gradual shift in the mix: higher retirement ages, reduced cost-of-living adjustments, and eventually some form of voluntary personal-account carve-out for younger workers. The Trump accounts look less like a replacement and more like a trial balloon for that carve-out, and the people who should watch closely are workers under 40, whose eventual benefit formula is the one most likely to change.
My advice for planning is the same regardless of the politics. Do not plan around a benefit number that Congress has the authority to change. Build the retirement income plan so it works with a reduced benefit, and treat anything better than that as upside.
Read the full article at US News & World Report →
